Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
J Neurol ; 269(10): 5606-5614, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2041278

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is an effective treatment in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) with consolidated evidence of clinical efficacy. However, only few studies have assessed long-term safety, causes of discontinuation, mortality, and relative predictors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 79 PD patients treated with LCIG between 2005 and 2020 in two Italian Neurological Centers, recording all adverse events (AEs), including weight loss (WL). Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the time to discontinuation and survival. Cox proportional hazard model was employed to identify predictors of discontinuation and mortality, while Pearson's correlation was used to analyze predictors of WL. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 47.7 ± 40.5 months and the median survival from disease onset was 25 years. There were three cases of polyradiculoneuropathy Guillain-Barre syndrome-like, all occurred in the early years of LCIG treatment. Twenty-five patients died (32%), 18 on LCIG (including one suicide) and seven after discontinuation. The mean WL was 3.62 ± 7.5 kg, which correlated with levodopa dose at baseline (p = 0.002), levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) baseline (p = 0.017) and off-duration (p = 0.0014), but not dyskinesia. Peristomal complications emerged as a negative predictor of discontinuation (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: LCIG has a relatively satisfactory long-term safety profile and efficacy and a relatively low rate of discontinuation. Peristomal complications may represent a predictor of longer duration of therapy. According to the mortality analysis, LCIG patients show a long lifespan. Delaying the initiation of LCIG does not affect the sustainability of LCIG therapy.


Subject(s)
Carbidopa , Parkinson Disease , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Gels/therapeutic use , Humans , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Weight Loss
2.
N Engl J Med ; 387(5): 408-420, 2022 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1972736

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aggregated α-synuclein plays an important role in Parkinson's disease pathogenesis. Cinpanemab, a human-derived monoclonal antibody that binds to α-synuclein, is being evaluated as a disease-modifying treatment for Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In a 52-week, multicenter, double-blind, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 2:1:2:2 ratio, participants with early Parkinson's disease to receive intravenous infusions of placebo (control) or cinpanemab at a dose of 250 mg, 1250 mg, or 3500 mg every 4 weeks, followed by an active-treatment dose-blinded extension period for up to 112 weeks. The primary end points were the changes from baseline in the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) total score (range, 0 to 236, with higher scores indicating worse performance) at weeks 52 and 72. Secondary end points included MDS-UPDRS subscale scores and striatal binding as assessed on dopamine transporter single-photon-emission computed tomography (DaT-SPECT). RESULTS: Of the 357 enrolled participants, 100 were assigned to the control group, 55 to the 250-mg cinpanemab group, 102 to the 1250-mg group, and 100 to the 3500-mg group. The trial was stopped after the week 72 interim analysis owing to lack of efficacy. The change to week 52 in the MDS-UPDRS score was 10.8 points in the control group, 10.5 points in the 250-mg group, 11.3 points in the 1250-mg group, and 10.9 points in the 3500-mg group (adjusted mean difference vs. control, -0.3 points [95% confidence interval {CI}, -4.9 to 4.3], P = 0.90; 0.5 points [95% CI, -3.3 to 4.3], P = 0.80; and 0.1 point [95% CI, -3.8 to 4.0], P = 0.97, respectively). The adjusted mean difference at 72 weeks between participants who received cinpanemab through 72 weeks and the pooled group of those who started cinpanemab at 52 weeks was -0.9 points (95% CI, -5.6 to 3.8) for the 250-mg dose, 0.6 points (95% CI, -3.3 to 4.4) for the 1250-mg dose, and -0.8 points (95% CI, -4.6 to 3.0) for the 3500-mg dose. Results for secondary end points were similar to those for the primary end points. DaT-SPECT imaging at week 52 showed no differences between the control group and any cinpanemab group. The most common adverse events with cinpanemab were headache, nasopharyngitis, and falls. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with early Parkinson's disease, the effects of cinpanemab on clinical measures of disease progression and changes in DaT-SPECT imaging did not differ from those of placebo over a 52-week period. (Funded by Biogen; SPARK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03318523.).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antiparkinson Agents , Parkinson Disease , alpha-Synuclein , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , alpha-Synuclein/immunology
4.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova ; 121(9): 152-156, 2021.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1485583

ABSTRACT

The article provides an overview of the data on the impact of Parkinson's disease on the risk of infection and the course of COVID-19, and also assesses the possible pathogenetic relationship between the SARS-CoV-2 virus, COVID-19 and PD. By penetrating the central nervous system, SARS-CoV-2 can cause not only neurological symptoms, but also exacerbate the course of an existing neurological disease. The impact of Parkinson's disease on the risk of infection and the course of COVID-19 is controversial. However, a number of authors support the opinion that PD is an anti-risk factor for the development of COVID-19, which is associated both with the pathogenesis of the disease and with the used antiparkinsonian drugs, in particular amantadines. There are no clear data indicating higher risk of infection and higher severity of COVID-19 in patients with PD. On the contrary, experimental and clinical data suggest a possible modifying role of α-synuclein and antiparkinsonian drugs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Parkinson Disease , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , alpha-Synuclein
5.
Rom J Morphol Embryol ; 61(4): 1007-1022, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1366011

ABSTRACT

Patients with serious mental illness are a high-risk category of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Patients with schizophrenia are not participatory and have increased mortality and morbidity, patients with dementia cannot be cared for while depression, anxiety, bipolar tubing are associated with low immune status. Social stress is amplified by social isolation, amplifying depression and the mechanisms of decreased immunity. Hygiene measures and prophylactic behavior are impossible to put into practice in conditions of chronic mental illness. In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the risk for severe development is associated with the presence of comorbidities and immune system deficiency. Prothrombotic status, cytokine storm and alveolar destruction are mechanisms that aggravate the evolution of patients, especially in the context in which they have dysfunction of the autonomic system. The activity of proinflammatory cytokines is accentuated by hyperglutamatergia, which potentiates oxidative stress and triggers the mechanisms of neural apoptosis by stimulating microglial activation. Activation of M1-type microglia has an important role in pathogenesis of major psychiatric disorders, such as major depression, schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, and may associate hippocampal atrophy and disconnection of cognitive structures. Memantine and Amantadine, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor inhibitors, have demonstrated, through their pharmacological profile, psychotropic effects but also antiviral properties. In the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, based on these arguments, we suggest that they can be associated with the therapy with the basic psychotropics, Memantine or Amantadine, for the control of neuropsychiatric symptoms but also as adjuvants with antiviral action.


Subject(s)
Amantadine/therapeutic use , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19/psychology , Memantine/therapeutic use , Mental Disorders/complications , Antiparkinson Agents/pharmacology , Comorbidity , Humans , Mental Disorders/virology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
6.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 11(3): 891-903, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1350244

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been considerable activity in the clinical development of novel and improved drug-based therapies for the neurodegenerative condition of Parkinson's disease (PD) during 2020. The agents that were investigated can be divided into "symptomatic" (alleviating the features of the condition) and "disease modifying" (attempting to address the underlying biology of PD) treatments, ST and DMT respectively, with further categorisation possible based on mechanism of action and class of therapy. OBJECTIVE: Our goal in this report was to provide an overview of the pharmacological therapies -both ST and DMT - in clinical trials for PD during 2020-2021, with the aim of creating greater awareness and involvement in the clinical trial process. We also hope to stimulate collaboration amongst commercial and academic researchers as well as between the research and patient communities. METHODS: We conducted a review of clinical trials of drug therapies for PD using trial data obtained from the ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organisation (WHO) registries, and performed a breakdown analysis of studies that were active as of February 18th 2021. We also assessed active drug development projects that had completed one clinical phase but were yet to start the next. RESULTS: We identified 142 trials on ClinicalTrials.gov and 14 studies on the WHO registries that met our analysis criteria. Of these 156 trials, 91 were ST and 65 were DMT, Of the 145 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in our 2020 analysis, 45 fell off the list and 42 were added. Despite this change, the balance of ST to DMT; the distribution across phases; the profile of therapeutic categories; and the proportion of repurposed therapies (33.5%); all remained very similar. There are only two DMTs in phase 3, and we identified 33 in-between-phase projects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, investment and effort in clinical trials for PD appears to remain strong. There has been little change in the profile of the clinical trial landscape even though, over the past year, there has been considerable change to the content of the list.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Drug Development , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Humans
9.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova ; 121(4): 101-106, 2021.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1244383

ABSTRACT

The article presents data from recent studies on the mechanisms of action and clinical efficacy of amantadines, and also describes a possible protective effect against COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Parkinson Disease , Amantadine/therapeutic use , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Levodopa , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 85: 109-113, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1179945

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: During the first peak phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the German Ministry of Health recommended that elective treatments should be postponed to increase hospital capacities. This has also compromised the capacity for application of specialized Parkinson's disease (PD) therapies to an unknown extent. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study using administrative database of all hospitalized patients with main diagnosis of PD receiving multimodal complex treatment (PD-MCT), initial setup of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) or continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) in Germany. We compared case numbers and clinical characteristics of the pandemic (March 16th - May 15th, 2020) and post-lockdown (July 16th - September 15th, 2020) period with the pre-pandemic (January 16th - March 15th, 2020) and historical control period (March 16th - May 15th, 2019). RESULTS: We identified a strong decline for PD-MCT(-62.8%) and for the application of drug pump-based therapies (-69.4%) during the first peak phase of the pandemic as compared to the pre-pandemic period while specialized PD treatment procedures increased again in the post-lockdown phase. Advanced disease was a marker for PD-MCT patients during the pandemic period. CONCLUSION: Besides the marked decline in specialized PD treatments during the first peak phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, we found recuperative effects for these procedures in the post-lockdown period without reaching pre-pandemic levels. Strengthening treatment capacities for PD patients, even in the event of a persistent pandemic, is urgently needed in order to maintain the quality of care.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , COVID-19/epidemiology , Infusion Pumps/trends , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/prevention & control , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/trends , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
11.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 11(2): 445-454, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1159008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many studies on Parkinson's disease (PD) patients affected by Coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) were recently published. However, the small sample size of infected patients enrolled in most studies did not allow to draw robust conclusions on the COVID-19 impact in PD. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess whether the prevalence and outcome of COVID-19 in PD patients are different from those observed in the general population. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting data on PD patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 (PD-COVID+). We extracted prevalence, clinical-demographic data, outcome, and mortality. We also analyzed risk or protective factors based on comparisons between PD-COVID+ and control populations with PD without COVID-19 or without PD with COVID-19. RESULTS: We included 16 studies reporting on a total of 11,325 PD patients, 1,061 with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. The median infection prevalence ranged from 0.6% to 8.5%. PD-COVID+ patients had a median age of 74 and a disease duration of 9.4 years. Pooling all PD-COVID+ patients from included studies, 28.6% required hospitalization, 37.1% required levodopa dose increasing, and 18.9% died. The case fatality was higher in PD-COVID+ patients than the general population, with longer PD duration as a possible risk factor for worse outcome. Amantadine and vitamin D were proposed as potential protective factors. CONCLUSION: Available studies indicate a higher case fatality in PD patients affected by COVID-19 than the general population. Conversely, current literature does not definitively clarify whether PD patients are more susceptible to get infected. The potential protective role of vitamin D and amantadine is intriguing but deserves further investigation.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , COVID-19/blood , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/blood , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
12.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 11(2): 431-444, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1045531

ABSTRACT

Studies focusing on the relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and Parkinson's disease (PD) have provided conflicting results. We review the literature to investigate: 1) Are PD patients at higher risk for contracting COVID-19 and are there specific contributing factors to that risk? 2) How does COVID-19 affect PD symptoms? 3) How does COVID-19 present in PD patients? 4) What are the outcomes in PD patients who contract COVID-19? 5) What is the impact of COVID-19 on PD care? 6) Does COVID-19 increase the risk of developing PD? A literature search was performed from 1979 to 2020 using the terms: 'Parkinson's disease' and 'parkinsonism' combined with: 'COVID-19'; 'SARS-CoV-2' and 'coronavirus'. It does not appear that PD is a specific risk factor for COVID-19. There is evidence for direct/indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2 on motor/non-motor symptoms of PD. Although many PD patients present with typical COVID-19 symptoms, some present atypically with isolated worsening of parkinsonian symptoms, requiring increased anti-PD therapy and having worse outcomes. Mortality data on PD patients with COVID-19 is inconclusive (ranging from 5.2%to 100%). Patients with advanced PD appear to be particularly vulnerable. Single cases of acute hypokinetic-rigid syndrome have been described but no other convincing data has been reported. The rapidity with which COVID-19 has swept across the globe has favored the proliferation of studies which lack scientific rigor and the PD literature has not been immune. A coordinated effort is required to assimilate data and answer these questions in larger PD cohorts.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Mortality/trends , Pandemics/prevention & control , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Risk Factors , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
13.
Trials ; 21(1): 1028, 2020 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-992539

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide valuable information and inform the development of harm profiles of new treatments. Harms are typically assessed through the collection of adverse events (AEs). Despite AEs being routine outcomes collected in trials, analysis and reporting of AEs in journal articles are continually shown to be suboptimal. One key challenge is the large volume of AEs, which can make evaluation and communication problematic. Prominent practice is to report frequency tables of AEs by arm. Visual displays offer an effective solution to assess and communicate complex information; however, they are rarely used and there is a lack of practical guidance on what and how to visually display complex AE data. METHODS: In this article, we demonstrate the use of two plots identified to be beneficial for wide use in RCTs, since both can display multiple AEs and are suitable to display point estimates for binary, count, or time-to-event AE data: the volcano and dot plots. We compare and contrast the use of data visualisations against traditional frequency table reporting, using published AE information in two placebo-controlled trials, of remdesivir for COVID-19 and GDNF for Parkinson disease. We introduce statistical programmes for implementation in Stata. RESULTS/CASE STUDY: Visualisations of AEs in the COVID-19 trial communicated a risk profile for remdesivir which differed from the main message in the published authors' conclusion. In the Parkinson's disease trial of GDNF, the visualisation provided immediate communication of harm signals, which had otherwise been contained within lengthy descriptive text and tables. Asymmetry in the volcano plot helped flag extreme events that were less obvious from review of the frequency table and dot plot. The dot plot allowed a more comprehensive representation by means of a more detailed summary. CONCLUSIONS: Visualisations can better support investigators to assimilate large volumes of data and enable improved informal between-arm comparisons compared to tables. We endorse increased uptake for use in trial publications. Care in construction of visual displays needs to be taken as there can be potential to overemphasise treatment effects in some circumstances.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Data Display , Data Visualization , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Research Design/standards , Adenosine Monophosphate/adverse effects , Alanine/adverse effects , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Computer Graphics , Data Accuracy , Data Analysis , Drug Monitoring/methods , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
14.
Mov Disord ; 35(11): 1905-1913, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-635701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Young plasma infusions have emerged as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative disease, and convalescent plasma therapy has been used safely in the management of viral pandemics. However, the effect of plasma therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of plasma infusions in people with PD. METHODS: A total of 15 people with clinically established PD, at least 1 cognitive complaint, and on stable therapy received 1 unit of young fresh frozen plasma twice a week for 4 weeks. Assessments and adverse effects were performed/reported on and off therapy at baseline, immediately after, and 4 weeks after the infusions ended. Adverse effects were also assessed during infusions. The primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and feasibility. Exploratory outcomes included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III off medication, neuropsychological battery, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6), uric acid, and quantitative kinematics. RESULTS: Adherence rate was 100% with no serious adverse effects. There was evidence of improvement in phonemic fluency (P = 0.002) and in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 stigma subscore (P = 0.013) that were maintained at the delayed evaluation. Elevated baseline tumor necrosis factor-α levels decreased 4 weeks after the infusions ended. CONCLUSIONS: Young fresh frozen plasma was safe, feasible, and well tolerated in people with PD, without serious adverse effects and with preliminary evidence for improvements in phonemic fluency and stigma. The results of this study warrant further therapeutic investigations in PD and provide safety and feasibility data for plasma therapy in people with PD who may be at higher risk for severe complications of COVID-19. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Plasma , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aging/blood , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Biomechanical Phenomena , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Interleukin-6/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Parkinson Disease/blood , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Risk , Severity of Illness Index , Speech Disorders/etiology , Speech Disorders/therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood
15.
Curr Med Chem ; 28(12): 2392-2408, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-745092

ABSTRACT

The last couple of months have witnessed the world in a state of virtual standstill. The SARS-CoV-2 virus has overtaken the globe to economic and social lockdown. Many patients with COVID-19 have compromised immunity, especially in an aged population suffering from Parkinson 's disease (PD). Alteration in dopaminergic neurons and deficiency of dopamine in PD patients are the most common symptoms affecting 1% population above the age of 60 years. The compromised immune system and inflammatory manifestation in PD patients make them an easy target. The most common drugs under trial for COVID-19 are remdesivir, favipiravir, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin along with adjunct drugs like amantadine with some monoclonal antibodies. Presently, clinically US FDA approved drugs in PD include Levodopa, catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors, (Entacapone and Tolcapone), dopamine agonists (Bromocriptine, Ropinirole, Pramipexole, and Rotigotine), monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors (Selegiline and Rasagiline), amantadine and antimuscarinic drugs. The drugs have established mechanisms of action on PD patients with known pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties along with dose and adverse effects. Conclusion and relevance of this review focus on the drugs that can be tried on PD patients with SAR CoV-2 infection, in particular, amantadine that has been approved by all the developed countries as a common drug possessing both antiviral properties by downregulation of CTSL, lysosomal pathway disturbance and change in pH necessary to uncoat the viral proteins and anti- Parkinson properties. To deal with the significant prognostic adverse effect of SARS-CoV-2 on PD, the present-day treatment options, clinical presentation and various mechanisms are the need of the hour.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Parkinson Disease , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Catechol O-Methyltransferase , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 78: 134-137, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-712120

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Specific pre-existing medical conditions (e.g. hypertension or obesity), advanced age and male sex appear linked to more severe manifestations of SARS Co-V2 infection, thus raising the question of whether Parkinson's disease (PD) poses an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In order to describe the outcome of COVID-19 in multi-centre a cohort of PD patients and explore its potential predictors, we gathered the clinical information of 117 community-dwelling patients with COVID-19 followed in 21 tertiary centres in Italy, Iran, Spain, and the UK. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 19.7%, with a significant effect of co-occurrence of dementia, hypertension, and PD duration. CONCLUSIONS: The frailty caused by advanced PD poses an increased risk of mortality during COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Dementia/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hypertension/epidemiology , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Deep Brain Stimulation , Female , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Spain/epidemiology , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL